<>Home <> Information for Patients <>Information for Physicians <>Treatments <>News <>

MENU
> Home
> Contacts
> Patients Info
Treatments
> Thermal Radiofrequency
> Pulse Radifrequency
> Prolotherapy

> Acupuncture

> Botox Injections

> Nerve Blockade

News
> Botox
> Disc Herniation
> Standard of Care


 

 

1. Management Of Chronic Low Back Pain

Clinical Update by Prof. Bogduk, N.

PDF File

 

2. Weight loss, physical therapy can help back pain

Dec 05 - A team of researchers has identified a catch-22 of lower back pain. Those with lower back injuries can exacerbate their pain by avoiding using hurt muscles. Other muscles, including those in the abdomen or on the sides of the torso, contort to compensate, leading to greater pressure on the spine and damaging discs, explain researchers from Ohio State University in Columbus. "We have often suspected that patients guard their trunk muscles but this (study) has shown for the first time how this results in increases in spine loading that can lead to secondary back injuries. This is important because second back injuries are often more serious and expensive," Dr. William S. Marras, the study's lead author, told Reuters Health. In the study, published in the December 1st issue of Spine, researchers asked 22 adults with lower back pain and 22 adults without injuries to lift various objects using identical postures and then to lift objects in whatever position was comfortable or natural. The investigators then measured the electrical activity of participants' muscles and compared pressure on the spine, known as spine loading, and the side-to-side force on the spine, know as lateral shear. Adults with lower back injuries used more muscles in the back when lifting, creating greater pressure on the spine. Injured patients experienced about 26% greater spine compression, a 75% increase in lateral shear, and used significantly more muscle activity for 10 muscles than noninjured adults, the report indicates. Additionally, people with lower back pain weighed more than their uninjured peers, a factor that significantly increased pressure on the spine. "Excessive body weight, or a protruding stomach, is like always holding a box in front of you," Marras said in an interview. "One must counterbalance the weight with more activity in the back muscles that aren't as far from the spine. It is like a see-saw where the back muscles are not as far from the fulcrum as the weight of the belly." The results of the study underscore the need for people with lower back pain to trim down, and suggest that physical therapy for certain types of back injuries aim to teach patients how to use their back muscles appropriately, the authors note. Typically, physical therapy focuses on strengthening the trunk muscles. Additionally, workplaces can make simple changes that would help reduce lower back pain among employees with lifting jobs. For instance, Marras suggested that lifting be done from waist level instead of from below the knee. "This would significantly reduce the loads on the spine even though the weight of the object has not changed," he explained. SOURCE: Spine 2001;26:2566-2574.

3. General practitioners underestimate intensity of patients' severe pain

2002-01-07 -- Primary care physicians tend to rate their patients' pain intensity significantly lower than do the patients themselves, especially when the pain is chronic or severe, Finnish investigators report. Twenty-eight primary care physicians from 25 health centres evaluated patients' pain intensity using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). Data were collected for 1 week during each of the four seasons in 1996. Dr. Pekka Mantyselka and colleagues of the University of Kuopio also requested the 738 patients, whose ages ranged from 16 to 75, to rate their pain intensity on a similar VAS as soon as possible after their office visit. The investigators divided the scales into five 20-mm units for the purpose of comparison. As reported in the British Journal of General Practice for December, the physicians graded pain intensity at least one unit lower than did patients in 36.7% of visits, and at least two units lower in 20.5% of visits. The nonconcordance between patients' and physicians' assessments increased with pain severity, so that at the highest grade perceived by patients, physicians rated pain lower in 82.2% of the visits. The disparity was also greater when the reason for the visit was chronic as opposed to acute pain. Dr. Mantyselka's team recommends that general practitioners ask patients to rate their pain intensity and that that evaluation should be "accepted as a standard in assessing pain intensity, particularly in monitoring the response to treatment," they write. In clarifying the findings, the Finnish investigators maintain that nonconcordance between the two assessments could indicate "complex problems behind the pain." Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:995-997.

4. Botox: Bad for Stomach but Good for Bad Back?

May 21 (Medscape Health) Don't try eating it, but a bacteria that causes food poisoning appears to relieve chronic back pain for several months, according to a new study. In a purified form, Botox (botulinum toxin A) has been found to help treat certain sorts of muscle spasms. Many researchers have tinkered with the toxin to see if it could be useful in treating everything from headaches to wrinkles. So far, the FDA has only licensed Botox for a couple of eye-muscle disorders, and last year, the agency added cervical dystonia (involuntary contractions of the neck and shoulder muscles) to the list of approved uses. But Bahman Jabbari, MD, of the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, says there is plenty of reason to think that Botox can safely stamp out chronic pain. "This has been around for almost 10 years now," says Jabbari. "A lot of patients have used it for other conditions, like neck pain or muscle spasticity." In a study published on May 21, 2001, in the journal Neurology, Jabbari's team reports that a total of 31 patients with a modest amount back pain were either injected with botulinum toxin A or with a saline solution that served as the placebo control (a "dummy" treatment). They were told to stick to their regular pain medications as well. After 3 weeks, the researchers asked the patients how they felt. The patients were polled them again 2 months later. By the third week nearly three-fourths of those who had had a shot of Botox said their pain had been cut in half. Only one-quarter of the placebo group reported the same amount of relief. Those who had pain in a specific area of their back seemed to do the best. "If there was a predominance of pain to one side, we injected there, which helped," explains Jabbari. The pain, however, eventually returns. About 60% felt as good from the Botox shot 2 months later compared to roughly 12% who reported the same amount of relief from the saline solution. "The effects last for about 3 or 4 months," he says. Any relief is better than none. But Jabbari admits that a handful of happy patients does not prove that Botox is useful for back pain suffers. "It's a small study," he says. "We need more research." Botox helps relax muscles, but experts still have no clear idea why it seems to combat chronic pain. Though side effects are rare, a careless doctor might give too high a dose, which could prove dangerous, Jabbari warns. Even so, many pain clinics already offer the popular toxin to those with aching backs, including Jabbari's own center. But some experts say more research is still needed on Botox treatments for back pain and urge their patients to use caution before trying them. "There's not enough scientific literature to support it," says John Kostuik, MD, who heads the Spine Division at Johns Hopkins Hospital. "I wouldn't recommend it."

 

<>Home <>Feedback <>